"A Cache Withdrawal" posts will consist of vivid memories in my educational experiences that have helped shaped who I am as an educator. Consider post an introspective of my philosophical beliefs regarding education.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are an educator who travels the United States of America to teaching conferences that are held throughout an academic school year, one of the issues that plague our schools, regardless of location and geographical region in the country, is that teachers have a difficult time bridging the gap between what students do in school and what students will do once they obtain a job.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are an educator who travels the United States of America to teaching conferences that are held throughout an academic school year, one of the issues that plague our schools, regardless of location and geographical region in the country, is that teachers have a difficult time bridging the gap between what students do in school and what students will do once they obtain a job.
As it stands, the two seemingly different domains can be
thought of as typically existing in the following way.
What students do in school is separate from what students
will do whenever they seek obtain their job. Note that both domains are not
connected to each other, and also notice that each domain contains a different
shape. The structure of the school environment and the structure of the
environment at a specific job are entirely different, and the boundaries of
what is allowed and expected are usually different as well. Consider the
contrasting colors represented by the school domain and the job domain; these
different colors represent what students will typically do in both domains –
purple represents acquiring knowledge for the sake of knowledge (with the hopes
of applying what is learned once a student is hired) in a school environment
while the green represents the fact that students will spend more time applying
knowledge and using skills in order to complete a given task. With different
structures, different boundaries, different expectations, and different skills
that are emphasized in both domains, it is not difficult to conceive that many
students have a significant amount of trouble as they transition from school
into the job market.
As an educator who is currently working on doctoral
coursework in STEM Education, I am highly interested in the blending of the two
domains in order to provide a better transition for students as they enter
adult-hood; I also want to see a blending of the two domains in order to show
students and workers that a person’s education and an individual’s job are inherently
linked in such a fashion that “education” can be acquired by “working” while “working”
is a result of “education”. In a perfect world, the two domains would more
closely resemble the following illustration to your left.
A student’s work completed at school and work completed
for a specific job should contain the same expectations, the same boundaries,
and should both mimic each other from a practical standpoint. Let’s meld a
student’s experiences at school with a student’s experiences at a job so that
the two almost become seamless.
One such way to help bring school experiences and
workforce experiences closer together is by implementing a cognitive
apprenticeship in your own classroom if given the opportunity. While one can
study the research associated with a cognitive apprenticeship, it is pertinent
to know that, a “Cognitive apprenticeship is
a theory of the process where a master of a skill teaches [teacher] that skill
to an apprentice [student].”
(Wikipedia, 2016 – See Link Below). Rather than dissecting the theory of a
cognitive apprenticeship, I do want to share an experience that is still the
most meaningful learning activity that I have ever had a chance to participate.
Imagine, if you will, the spring semester of my senior
year of high school. The year was 2007, and I was enjoying my final days of my
glorious high school years. I was enrolled in a Chemistry 2 course, which was a
continuation of the school’s first Chemistry course since our school did not
offer Advanced Placement Chemistry at the time. Two weeks before the end of the
semester, my teacher assigned the course’s final project.
The final project was assigned as follows:
- A school employee has been murdered (a member of
the science department)
- The murder scene consists of the dead body (with
a bruise on the back of his head), a rope tied on one end, broken class, the
top rim of a fish tank, one dead fish, spilled liquid (clear), spilled liquid
(brown), and another mysterious liquid that appeared to have a pinkish color.
- A list of eye witness accounts of where five of
the department’s science teachers were at the time of the murder along with
their personal statements regarding where they were and what they were doing
- It was our job to determine the contents of all
three liquids, identify the three liquids, and connect the three liquids to the
murder of the dead individual.
- After determining the contents of the liquids
and the identification of the liquids, it was the students’ jobs to piece together
how the three liquids were related, and how the three liquids contributed to
the murder of the individual.
Without much guidance, we were instructed that we had two weeks in the school’s chemistry laboratory to run whatever tests that we desired. We were allowed to use chemistry equipment found in the laboratory which also included technological probes that could be used to make accurate scientific measurements.
As we me made measurements in the laboratory in order to
ultimately determine the murderer, all students were required to keep a
notebook of the following components:
-
Notebook Cover Page (Name, Date, Class, Class
Period, and Title of the Project)
-
Driving Question Page (What we were required to
investigate)
-
Evidence Page (An annotated list of all forms of
evidence available to the students)
-
Data Pages (An organized, sequenced collection
of pages of collected data, calculations, data tables, and graphs)
-
A summary of findings
-
An account of how the murder took place by
connecting the three mystery liquids to the broken glass, the rope, the rim of
a fish tank, the dead fish, and the bump on the individual’s head.
-
An accompanying PowerPoint that summarizes the
content of the notebook so that it can be presented to the rest of the students
in the class
Over the next two weeks, I ran the following tests on
each of the three liquids
- Density (as a result of measuring the volume and
mass of a given liquid) calculations were conducted for each of the three
liquids
o Each
calculation was meticulously shown to be reported later
- Freezing Point Test – To see at what temperature
the liquids froze
- Computerized Graphs for each liquid were created
to show how the liquid’s temperature changed over time
- Boiling Point Test – To see at what temperature
the liquid began to boil and to see if any residue was left as a result of
boiling away the liquid
o This
also showed if more than one liquid substance was contained within the “sample
liquids”
- Computerized Graphs for each liquid were created
to show how the liquid’s temperature changed over time
- Particle Separation Test – To see if the liquids
contained any particulate matter
o Data
tables were constructed to qualitatively show if any large particulate matter
was left behind for each liquid
o If
particulate matter was left behind, measurements in terms of mass and size were
conducted and also placed in the data tables
- Centrifugal Liquid Test – To see if any of the
liquids contained more than one liquid that could be separated in much the same
manner that a blood centrifuge can separate blood components.
o Photographs
were taken of each centrifugal test and liquids identified by color (after
separation) were recorded based on the density of the liquids
Since a test is only conclusive with multiple trials,
each test was conducted at least three times to ensure that data acquisition
was confidently collected.
Whenever data was collected, tables were created, and
graphs were constructed, all of results were required to be organized in a
notebook in a logical, sequential manner. It was also required that anything
placed in the notebook (written statements, calculations, data tables, and
graphs) were required to be completed on a computer in order for the notebook
to remain professional.
At the end of the two weeks, complete analysis of the
three liquids were conducted, the three liquids were connected (salt water,
blood, and soap containing soil) to the crime scene in order to form a written
account of how the murder took place.
At the end of the activity I found that the murdered
individual was carrying his salt water fish tank on the second floor of the
building, accidentally slipped on a rope that was laying on the floor (which
was used earlier in the day by the JROTC for their daily training), and fell
down to the first story of the front foyer. The individual landed on his back,
but his head bumped the floor during impact, the fish tank fell to the ground
next to his body, and salt water (with the salt water fish) was spilled all
over the floor. The dead individual started bleeding, but the blood had sat
long enough to develop a brownish/rust-like color. The football coach (who
happened to be another science teacher) witnessed the accidence, used soap to
attempt to clean up the scene, and accidentally got dirt from his football
field mixed with the soap. For fear of being accused of killing the other
science member, the football coach left the scene to return to the football
field house.
While the minutiae of the activity is not necessarily
important, it is evident that I was given an opportunity to complete an
investigation as if I worked for a Crime Scene Unit, and I was able to apply my
Chemistry knowledge with the help of teacher who served in the capacity as a
mentor throughout the project. In essence, I was a part of a cognitive
apprenticeship that more closely mimicked the real world when compared to what
students typically do in a traditional Chemistry class. It is this cognitive
apprenticeship that has allowed me to keep vivid memories of the experience
even though it took place almost ten years ago.
My teacher successfully blended the domains of school and
a job into a singular domain in which success relied on both so that I could
leave long-term memories of my experiences in my final year of high school.
The question is…
How can we do this in more academic disciplines in such a
way that these experiences are the norm rather than unique projects?
And with that, I am caching out!

No comments:
Post a Comment